This blog represents my views and opinions. They are not necessarily those of any other member of my Chambers, none of whom contribute to the blog, or assist me with it.


Now moved to http://pupillageandhowtogetit.wordpress.com/ for reasons of convenience and ease. Come and see.

Tuesday, 19 February 2008

Career Aids

My attention has been drawn to a competitor site to this one which attempts to provide career advice for aspiring barristers. Law Careers.Net provides a pretty comprehensive guide to the basics, complete with a message from the Chairman of the Bar - so it must be respectable.

I want to be honest about this: the way in which my attention was drawn to the site was by an email from them saying they were reviewing the blog and it might be nice if I sent a little puff the other way. Nothing like saying it like it is. That would have been the end of it, save that when I sent my usual response saying that I will only say what I really think, they replied 'ok', which distinguishes them from 99% of people making the same request (also why there are no ads on this site). I think that completes my Nolan disclosure.

The information provided is helpful, but uncritical. The BVC, for example, is covered but there is no hint that the course content and value is debated. I am sure that the providers would argue that this isn't their remit, and they do say that becoming a barrister is 'an expensive, high risk project'. The page entitled 'Bar Practice Areas' is helpful in terms of what to expect and what to do to make yourself an attractive candidate. It is, of course, far too London-centric with only 3 non-London barristers making an appearance (and one of them belongs to a London based set with a provincial annexe). But that is par for the course. The site is also linked to the BPP law school but doesn't seem to push it.

Their review of the legal blogging scene is interesting. I'm not sure I do permit my personal life to 'bleed' into the blog, although the image is striking. But one of the great things about a blog is that no one has to read it, so you can write what you want to write. When, ocassionally, some of the more conservatively minded of my acquaintances have expressed doubts about content and tone, I have rather taken the view that they can try their own approach and we can measure relative success. No one has yet done so, but the possibility is always there.

My own view is that demonstrating that barristers have a life outside the sub-fusc suit is probably useful as far as the public's view of the profession is concerned, and that mature, sensible people are capable of disregarding anything which jars on them if the information provided is helpful. To try and please everyone all of the time is dull, and would render the blog so anodyne that reading an Opinion on a bog-standard road traffic accident in which you were not involved would be preferrable. I hope that my pleasure in the job, my dedication to its basic principles and the reputation of the profession and the quite genuine desire to help those whose father was not (as mine was) in a position to assist is obvious to anyone who doesn't actually want to find fault for some bizarre purpose of their own. If not, then I'm not much of an advocate - in which case I shall wait for the deluge of Very High Cost Cases to come my way.

As far as Law Careers is concerned, the information seems to be reliable and the articles are decently written. You can, I think, use it with confidence. It is not, obviously, remotely as exciting and immediate as this site. That's enough plug for now.


Lost London Law Student said...

Nice plug.
The difference between such websites and blogs is that blogs tell you the reality of such things, they are written by people who are sentient beings and have emotions.

Lawcareers for what its worth is good for a general overview. But it has a clinical feel to it. I tend to hate any law career website,or career orientated website.

simply wondered said...

how dreadful to let real life bleed into a law blog - or worse, the law! if we did that more often, we might get law that is more responsive to the needs of real people not merely as viewed through the (necessarily skewed) view of a profession earning a lot more money (even those poor whingeing sods doing the horrible underpaid criminal stuff - did anyone ask you to do it? don't you like it? well do something else and stop the bloody moaning)than your ordinary joe. did you know teachers can earn up to £41K!!! lucky lucky lucky - that's after some years of working at it btw. and if we think we as lawyers are more important than that, we should find those things at the bottom of our legs and check where the ground is.
keep the humanity bleeding through, please, simon...

Anonymous said...


I discovered your site through lawcareers.net and I can honestly say that your blog is the best site prospective barristers that I've encountered. Keep up the good work!

Something I would find very interesting would be to hear your thoughts on prospects for mature entrants to the profession. All being well I'll be 33 by the time I finish the BVC, and since you seem to manage to find the right blend of realism and encouragement, your thoughts/advice would be welcome.

Anyway, very much appreciate the blog, so thanks again,


simply wondered said...

simon - is there a prize for the oldest person converting to law posting here? tenancy...?
still winning at 42!
i can only see the upside for a chambers getting a product with 20 more years expereince of running a business, real life, maturity and judgement - not to mention a thicker skin. i don't know that i am better than the competition 20 years my junior, but i am certain i am way better than i would have been 20 years ago.

simply wondered said...

assuming i learn how to spell experience before OLPAS...
it really is the little things.

Paul Smith said...

Well-written! My greatest appreciations for such an exclusive work! Hope you will be able to cooperate with this college writing service, as this collaboration may become useful and helpful for both sides!